Wednesday, September 3, 2014

Asphalt Graves


"They paved paradise and put up a parking lot" 
There once was a grove of 103 coconut trees, planted, coincidentally, 103 years ago.  A century of war, flooding, fires, and hurricanes; yet the trees survived.  

The hundred foot palms stood silently as their brothers were cut down for what is now the Marriott Courtyard.  They witnessed the rise and fall of the Coconut marketplace: aptly named for the trees that it displaced.  From their very top, it was just possible to see the derelict Cocopalms hotel to the south.  As trees do, they watched without complaint as the Coconut Coast transitioned to resorts and asphalt.   

Shortly after statehood, in order to incentivize infrastructure construction, Hawaiʻi adopted a “highest and best use” policy of land taxation.  Meaning that land would be taxed based on a bureaucrats idea of its "best use," regardless of whether it was vacant or a skyscraper. With that, the tax designation for the coconut grove changed to resort; effectively ensuring the trees' eventual destruction.  For forty-one years the land holders (descendants of the man who planted the trees) had been paying the highest possible tax rate for a grove of coconut trees that generated zero income.  
"They took all the trees, and put em in a tree museum"
The trees were deemed "Exceptional Trees" under State law Act 105, which mandates that the counties "review" any effort to "endanger" them.  However, coconut trees, which have evolved over the millenia to grow in nutrient deficient sand, withstand high winds, fight off disease, and float across the pacific are completely defenseless against the forces of capitalism.  And, act 105 wasn't enough.
"And they charged the people a dollar and a half to see them"
CVS, which owns Longs Drugs (and 6,700 other stores) is the 12th largest company in the world.  And they have a policy to pursue “stand-alone” stores.  That simple policy, based off of years of brand analysis and market research, deemed their current 20,000 square foot store inadequate for maximum profitability. So, they set their sights on abandoning their location in order to build a new and improved 23,000 sq ft store and 66,000 sq ft parking lot in the 2 acre coconut grove 400 yards away.  The only problem being that the trees were protected under Act 105.  Luckily, they knew the magic words.  According to their spokesperson,* CVS Longs Drugs “wants to preserve the grove-like atmosphere by integrating the project into the site by maintaining, re-planting and relocating some of the trees in order to keep the same number of trees that exist today."  

Approval was granted, the land sold, 72% of the land cleared, and the "tropical" themed store is now nearing completion.  




"Don't it always seem to go
That you don't know what you got 'til it's gone"
When the black dust fences come down, the sudden unveiling effectively erases our memory of the coconut grove that used to stand before.  As the sadness and anger fade, we complete the story with our complicity.  The next time I need new $3 slippers, I will park my truck on the asphalt grave of "exceptional trees," walk into the cold fluorescence and barely audible music of the polynesian themed CVS Longs Drugs, and retroactively sign the death warrant of 54 coconut trees as I hand the teller my money.

This is the first of two parts on development on Kaua'i with a focus on the CVS Longs Drugs in Kapa'a.




*Quoted from the Minutes of the 09/26/13 County of Kauaʻi Public Access, Open Space, and Natural Resources Preservation Fund Commission

4 comments:

  1. So what Luke? Luke the pacifist would let this happen without a fight, resigning himself to saying "that's the way it is"? Or next time, Luke the activist would say "hell no the trees won't go" and rally the community to do what is right, stop the construction perhaps use public money to purchase and preserve, and then be blamed for stopping progress, killing jobs and dividing the community. Sorry but just could not resist. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Perhaps one specific place to begin a fundamental re-evaluation of this mid-20th century land-use taxation policy would be to re-examine, and re-determine just exactly what the 'best' part of 'best use' actually means to us today.

    By what metric is the 'best-ness' determined, and is that the metric we wish to continue working with. 'Best' in terms of just exactly what? And why? And for whom?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Zoning determines the end use, we should all expect lands zoned resort will one day actually be used for that purpose. If you don't like the underlying zoning on the island, then work to change that.When the county allows that zoning to be abused like lands zoned agriculture being used for resorts that is wrong. At Longs the zoning was resort, a clearly commercial use and not much different than having a store there. Abuse has run rampant with land zoned residential that is being used for commercial resort use, one of the main reasons there is nowhere for young people who were born and raised here have to accept such crappy living situations and slum landlords. But allowing a store in the midst of stores and resorts is no big deal. Hey, what about the moat??

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous 7:15;
      In my follow-up post to this topic, I did acknowledge that zoning and tax policy are the root cause. I agree that there is no fixing this "issue" without looking at those causes.

      Delete